Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:40

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What was your best unexpected reunion with your childhood best friend?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What are some good interior design tips for mixing lots of colors together in a room?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Why the end of Google as we know it could be your biggest opportunity yet - ZDNet
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Google, Scale AI's largest customer, plans split after Meta deal, sources say - CNBC
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
SEC clears Trump Media filing, opening door to multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin buy - The Block
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
UFC Atlanta predictions - MMA Fighting
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
You May Want To Think Twice Before You Eat Bagged Lettuce - HuffPost
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.